Today I was reminded of one of the pitfalls of specializing/focusing on techie stuff. A myriad number of good things happened this weekend, most of which passed me by unnoticed in my exuberance to solve the "big" problem...
Was invited by a friend to walk this morning with DC Front Runners (http://dcfrontrunners.com ), a gay group of people who run together. The walking group walked a few miles around DC and observed the architecture of the various buildings downtown. Although it was somewhat chilly, the company, the buildings, and the running historical commentary from my friend captured my complete attention. It was definitely something that I enjoyed despite the weather
After the "walk", we had an informal lunch on the steps and listened to an impromptu debate over the need to reform medical care in the US. On the way to the car, had a stupid (on my part and probably avoidable) discussion over a previous entry in my blog. To some extent it confirmed a weakness in my oral and written communication skills. People automatically assume that if you're intelligent that you are proficient in these skills, not realizing that techies (who are extremely intelligent), would rather talk to computers than people because computers are easier (for them) to communicate with (a circular reinforcing weakness).
It made me realize how critical it is to distinguish when one is venting versus when one believes a fact to be true.
I spent most of the day with my friend (a very generous and appreciated allocation of his time), questioning both him and myself on various topics close to my heart. We ended up going to two hardware stores looking at various items and purchasing a few things. He's one of those three elusive guys that I had been chasing over the past six months, with probably no hope of catching (any of them). Since he's still resolving issues from his last break-up, he's leery of providing the appearance of being ready for another relationship. Some of my questions and/or attempts to draw him out have unwittingly put him on the defensive at times (almost as if I crossed an invisible barrier of impropriety. I guess that once I let people through my usual boundary it appears that anything goes. He's suggested more than once that I'm entirely too generous with people. I guess right now I view it as just being me.).
His viewpoint puts me somewhat on the defensive because even though I've been dating for a few years (as opposed to his twenty years plus), I'm still forming my dating preferences. One of the "funny" moments (he didn't find it funny, unfortunately) today occurred when one of the Front Runners suggested that "my friend" had to let me "lead" sometime, so why not now? I had assumed that my friend had "learned" to lead by first "following" but that was not the case. While I view myself a "lead", I have considered that one might be a better "lead" by learning to "follow" from a "strong" lead. Not necessarily from him, but perhaps from someone equally "strong". Perhaps, I need to reconsider this strategy or work with a "strong follower"?
The communication issues became more pronounced during the times I told him how I feel/felt about him (and I finally and correctly) was able to read his body language and realize that he felt I was pressuring him to respond according. Strangely enough, my purpose was to simply share that information -- almost as if this were a second coming out and it was important to be as clear as possible instead of letting him read between the lines.
Unsuprising, I spent all afternoon examining both him and the situation with him and the other guys. An extension of my desire to determine what it is I really want/need at this stage of my life. Steve has challenged my current "out" status and recommended that I won't find peace because I can't be myself while I'm not out to everyone. The funny (or sad) thing is that I still don't know how I like my eggs (ala Runaway Bride").
One of the reasons I really treasure my friend for is his knowledge of a variety of subjects. In this case, human interaction/sexuality. Today, he didn't disappoint me at all. We discussed the differences between emotional and physical relationships and how the two of us fitted into this model. He sorted of glossed over his feelings to me in this respect and I didn't press him. When he doesn't want to answer, it's not really worth the effort since he's an accomplished extemporaneous speaker (and former politician). I guess my own thoughts on this topic are he's flattered that a "cute guy" (his words not mine) is so interested in him, but he's careful to state that he's not available and even suggested and pointed out a couple of guys who are (sigh). His "anglo-saxon" reticence and style of communication sometimes leave me scratching my head, since sometimes I'm not sure whether he's committed himself to one position or another. (I'm sure my non-anglo (and techie) obtuseness also irritates him!) The burning question in my mind is that IF he was available, would he be attracted to me? A relevant question since, I'm not usually his type.
I can't really explain (even to myself) what is the attraction, but it definitely is not (only) physical -- more akin like a moth to a flame (which is very unusual for me). At this point, my creditability with him (as far as our "relationship" goes) is at an all time low (he's running away, I'm trying to 'splain). I enjoy being around him and chatting over meals and so forth. As far as physical contact goes, I wouldn't mind having him touch or hug me (he works on backs very well), but I'm pretty sure that I'm not ready to get "physical" with him. VERY hard to communicate when I keep accidently brush up against him. At the very least, he's turned out to be definitely close (in terms of emotional closeness), something I've never considered before.
One of the things that is definitely clear is that I enjoy getting out with my friends. Since Jeff and I parted ways three years ago, the position of close friend and almost constant companion has been mostly vacant. My best friend does a good job of temporary stand-in, but our times together have been sparse and somewhat spotty. Do I need a female stand-in? Perhaps not...